Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study analyzes the extent of gold open access (OA) publishing options in 377 anthropology journals by applying a coding scheme ranging from 0) non-transparent publishing options to 5) fully OA (free to read and publish without embargo). This analysis is meant to simplify the process of identifying OA journal publishing options in the discipline of anthropology, in addition to sharing findings on some of the prominent issues in OA publishing as they relate to anthropology journals, including non-transparency by publishers and the prevalence and price of article processing charges (APCs). We conclude that publishers should be more transparent about their OA publishing options and policies by providing conspicuous and straightforward information to potential authors. Further, we find that in the anthropology scholarly communication ecosystem, APCs for hybrid journals are more expensive than those for fully gold OA journals, thus contradicting the assumption that gold OA is more costly to researchers.

Publication Title

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

First Page

123

Last Page

139

DOI

10.3138/jsp.49.1.123

Publication Date

10-1-2017

Publisher

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

College

University Libraries

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/11668/14189

Share

COinS