Degree
Bachelor of Science (B.S.)
Major(s)
Biomedical Engineering
Document Type
Immediate Open Access
Abstract
The arthroscope was a revolutionary development in the fields of medicine, engineering, and ethics. There are many valuable lessons to be learned from the story of its development and translation that are relevant to the future of medicine and society. Beginning with a brief description of the tool’s design, this paper will examine a period within the history of the arthroscope. This window contains multiple innovators and ends with the life and work of Dr. Robert Jackson. In examining the relevant historical facts of its development, this paper will then briefly address the importance of sports medicine in the development of the arthroscope and proceed to a discussion of the medical ethics involved. The concept of invasiveness will then be defined and explained to understand the ethical fluctuations caused by this surgical instrument. Lastly, Dr. John Bickle’s model for analyzing neuroscientific research tools will be compared to the development of the arthroscope in order to discover ways in which its development can inform future innovations. Beginning with this instrument’s translation from Japan to North America, analyzing its impact on shifting ethical definitions, and concluding with a foray into metascientific details of tool development, this paper will look down the metaphorical barrel of the arthroscope to reveal how its translation provides valuable insight into the future.
Date Defended
4-22-2026
Thesis Director
Dr. John Bickle
Second Committee Member
Dr. Courtney Thompson
Third Committee Member
Dr. Christian Flow
Recommended Citation
Waterer, Montgomery F., "A Treatise on Tool Development: The arthroscope’s cultural, technological, and metascientific translation" (2026). Honors Theses. 210.
https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/honorstheses/210
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Biomedical Devices and Instrumentation Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons, Sports Sciences Commons