Theses and Dissertations
Issuing Body
Mississippi State University
Advisor
Emison, Gerald
Committee Member
Stich, Bethany
Committee Member
Breaux, David
Committee Member
Stanisevski, Dragan
Date of Degree
5-1-2010
Document Type
Dissertation - Open Access
Major
Public Policy & Administration
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Department
Department of Political Science
Abstract
This research, by utilizing the descriptive aspect of the communicative planning model, examined the opinions of surveyed public planners to understand their perceptions concerning their roles in the implementation of comprehensive plans. The research developed a Q-methodology design to uncover a typology of opinion concerned the perceived roles played by participants throughout the planning process in counties within the state of Georgia. The research contributes to the literature by developing this typology and by using it to assess the opinions of public planners. Through the use of Q-methodology, the research analyzed 34 usable Q-sorts from Georgia planners. Based on analysis of these sorts, four distinct types of opinion were found. The planning participants appear to be communicating opinions that represent the following: mostly positive roles on structural issues, such as budgeting, coordinating, and plan complexity; two roles that are positive of public participation; and two roles that are negative of public participation and focused on economic development. The research‘s typology shows that the planning participants view planning in two dimensions: political (opinion concerning the public) and functional (opinion concerning what leads to successful planning).
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11668/15119
Recommended Citation
Hatcher, William Scott, "Planners' perceptions of their communicative roles in the implementation of local comprehensive plans: a Q-methodology study" (2010). Theses and Dissertations. 3545.
https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/3545
Comments
opinions of public planners||local comprehensive planning||community development