Theses and Dissertations

ORCID

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6460-3048

Advisor

Ramirez Avila, John J.

Committee Member

Tarso, Paulo

Committee Member

Swan, J. Edward

Committee Member

Gonzalez, Carlos

Committee Member

Khalid, Mohammad

Date of Degree

5-15-2026

Original embargo terms

Embargo 2 years

Document Type

Graduate Thesis - Open Access

Major

Civil Engineering

Degree Name

Master of Science (M.S.)

College

James Worth Bagley College of Engineering

Department

Richard A. Rula School of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Abstract

The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method underpins U.S. runoff estimation, yet its fixed initial-abstraction ratio 0.20 often overstates flows. Analyses spanning 1,358 watersheds show initial abstraction ratio can vary, with a value of 0.05 better matching observed hydrographs, especially for minor storms. Such conservatism inflates design runoff and drives expensive oversizing of drainage infrastructure. To modernize CN calibration, this thesis unites three investigations. First, regional linear and exponential initial abstraction ratio–CN conversion equations between 0.2 and 0.05 are evaluated to improve translation accuracy. Second, least-squares error and asymptotic calibrations are benchmarked with RSE, NSE, KGE, and PBIAS, and a composite metric, OF_KGE, is proposed to balance bias, variability, and timing while resisting outliers. Third, the optimal pairing—LSE-unsorted calibration with OF_KGE—is applied nationwide, generating a precision-λ map that exposes clear geographic gradients. The resulting data-driven framework replaces one-size-fits-all conservatism with statistically robust, location-specific guidance that enhances runoff prediction and reduces infrastructure costs.

Available for download on Saturday, June 10, 2028

Share

COinS