Theses and Dissertations
Issuing Body
Mississippi State University
Advisor
Keeley, Jared W.
Committee Member
Eakin, Deborah K.
Committee Member
McKinney, Cliff
Date of Degree
8-17-2013
Original embargo terms
MSU Only Indefinitely
Document Type
Graduate Thesis - Campus Access Only
Major
Clinical Psychology
Degree Name
Master of Science
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Department
Department of Psychology
Abstract
This study questions whether expertise plays a role in how mental health clinicians remember case details about their clients. Specifically, are expert clinicians better at teasing apart complex case details than novices? Clinicians’ diagnostic schemas may afford a mechanism for easily retaining and retrieving information about particular cases. American Board of Professional Psychologists certified clinicians acted as our expert participants. Undergraduate students enrolled in general psychology acted as novices. Results indicated experts recalled more information than non-experts for each of three hypothetical case vignettes—simple, complex-coherent, and complex-incoherent. As complexity of the vignettes increased the overall amount of recall increased for the complex-coherent vignette and then decreased for the complex-incoherent vignette for both groups. Experts also exhibited more false recalls of symptom specific details for the complex-incoherent case. This finding is evidence of schema-based knowledge and experts’ tendency to use schemas in an effort to make sense of illogical cases.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11668/20229
Recommended Citation
Webb, Christopher Allen, "Are Clinicians Better At Conceptualizing And Recalling Case Details?" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 724.
https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/724